|
Post by fe2cruz on Nov 6, 2007 2:02:46 GMT -5
Hi all,
Read some previous threads about Ikon springs. I have RaceTech near me, would Ikon still be cheaper on the SR? I'm really interested in a fork brace too. Anyone have a vendor source or pictures of an installed unit they can share? I'm assuming it uses the mounts of the fender.
Here's the adjusted #s including all oils .17 gallons gas, mag/tubes, disc brakes, extra bags, tools and a jack.
total rig = 485 lbs or 220.45 Kgs '78-SR500 = 365 lbs or 165.91 Kgs sidecar = 120 lbs or 54.55 Kgs
other weight not included driver = 145 lbs or 65.91 Kgs ballast = 40 lbs or 18.18 Kgs
Any suggestions for the added stress and weight on this setup would be appreciated.
thanks again! -c
|
|
|
Post by milkman on Nov 6, 2007 4:09:30 GMT -5
55kgs, is that all for the sidecar? Is it home made or a bought job?
Wire wheels would obviously save some weight, but thats a lot of hassle sourcing some with the right hub for the brakes you want etc Lighter brakes etc, but it all starts getting expensive.
I'm impressed with your Driver weight though. Thats at least 20kgs better than I can muster
I was laughing one day, thinking here I am trying to shave off weight by grinding tabs, when I could do myself and the bike a favour and ditch the gut!
Nah.....grinding is easier
|
|
|
Post by curly001 on Nov 6, 2007 4:34:14 GMT -5
Stuff that I'll just make the bike faster/more powerful. I've worked long and hard on this gut/stomach(6 pack more like 2 doz pack) and no under powered piece of machinery is going to make me go to jenny craig. Curly
|
|
|
Post by fe2cruz on Nov 6, 2007 13:42:14 GMT -5
55kgs, is that all for the sidecar? The tub is '70/80s all fiberglass spirit eagle actually only 30kgs by itself. The sidecar has a lighter tube wire wheel too as opposed to the mags on my bike. My subframe is all steel and acts like a ballast and stout support for the light tub. The rider is just short and skinny; metabolism. Good for saving gas, but lacking the skills for racing. So all you guys would still beat me off the line no matter where your wasteline is. I've read Australian sidecar companies and most builders create more sturdy outfits compared to the rest of the world because of the terrain. My subframe survives potholes but my current suspension would not survive stones and dirt ruts. But since the added wieght isn't as bad as i thought hopefully I won't have to spend too much money. Are there any used scources for the rear springs that I could source from a wrecker? Any 90s or closer to modern bikes that have stronger rear shocks but are easy to come by used? The Virago shocks look similar but not much stronger.
|
|
|
Post by colinjay on Nov 6, 2007 16:57:07 GMT -5
Hi,
My best friend and ex competition sidecar passenger owns Premier Sidecars (and is currently trying to sell the business to me), he uses Ikon shocks on all the sidecars he builds. Aside from the cost (Ikon shocks are made in Aust therfore cheaper than most other shocks here), the big advantage of the Ikons shock is the adjustable damping, which makes it easier to set up the sidecar suspension. Determining the correct spring rate for the sidecar suspension is mostly trial and error combined with previous experience, and depends on the actual geometry of the sidecar suspension, i.e. swingarm length, angle shock is mounted at etc, so it is not really possible to advise what weight spring to use. I am sure that there would be some internet forums for sidecars in the US, and these may be your best bet for advice about the sidecar.
On the matter of sidecar chassis being made heavier here in Aust, you are farly correct, most makers use 2" heavey gauge box section steel tubinf for the chassis on general road/touring sidecars. Better a bit heavy than breaking 100-km from no where. The chassis's of the cometition sidecars that I used to build were made from 3/4" and 1" thin wall round tubing, but weight was (is) a big issue in observed trials and braking a tube at trials speed had no unfortunate consequences.
As to the bit about rider weight, I now weigh 125kg in riding gear (I am 193cm (6' 3" tall), and truely believe that there is no point trying to shave a couple of Kg of the weigh of the Sr when it would be both cheaper and healthier to loose 20kg of my onw body!
CJ
|
|
|
Post by fe2cruz on Nov 6, 2007 18:06:58 GMT -5
Determining the correct spring rate for the sidecar suspension is mostly trial and error combined with previous experience, and depends on the actual geometry of the sidecar suspension, i.e. swingarm length, angle shock is mounted at etc Since my rig is so light and not a standard setup most of the sidecar forums have just told me to upgrade what is on the bike to something stronger (pretend you are upgrading the bike for trail use) I plan to leave the shock that came on the sidecar as is and just upgrade the bike suspension which has not been modified in anyway.
|
|
|
Post by colinjay on Nov 6, 2007 21:25:46 GMT -5
For the rear shocks, any good quality shock would do, but adjustable damping is a feature that is well worth the extra cost. As to a spring rate for the rear shocks, the "rule of thumbs" was always to increase the spring rate by 10% as a starting point (i.e. if the std spring is 100 lb/in then fit 110 lb/in springs). This give you a starting point for furhter experimenting. Note jacking up the spring preload with alter the static ride hight but will not actually stiffen the suspension. You then move on to looking at the static and loaded sag of the suspension. A lot of people say static sag should be about 1" (25mm), but this is dependant on the overall suspension travel, as a percentage, static sag should generally not be more that 25% of the overall suspension travel. To measure the static sag you need to accuratly measure between a fixed point on the rear of the bike (for rear suspension a top shock mounting bolt is good) and the ground, with the outfit on a level concrete floor and unladened (no excess stuff on the bike or in the sidecar). You the take a second measurement, with the suspension fully extended, ie lift the back up until all the weight is off the rear suspension and the rear wheel is starting to lift off of the ground. The difference between these to meaurements is your static sag. Knowing the this figure and the total suspension travel you can the work out the percentage of static sag. Loaded sag is measurement the same was except instead of the outfit being unladened, you have the normal load of ride, passenger and luggage on the bike/in the sidecar for the first measurement (he extended measurement should be the same). There is a lot of variation on how much this should be, with opinions ranging from 25% thru to 50% of the avaialble travel, my personal preference is around the 30 - 35% mark. Taking all of the above into consideration, there are big trade offs between comfort and handling. If your suspension is hard, the outfit will handle more precisely with very little "body roll" when cornering but be uncofotable when riding over rough or corrurgated roads. If too soft, it will wallow around when cornnering (sometime to dangerous levels) be be a comfortable as a lounge chair over a rough road. On the outfit that I am currently building on my XS1100, I am fitting an old air assisted shock from a Kawasaki GT750, as it gives me the ability to adjust the overall spring rate not just the spring preload. I also intend to fit simmilar shocks to the rear suspension, when I find a set and will probably use the same shocks on the leading link front forks that I will eventually make for it. Here is a picture of the progress so far on the XS1100 CJ
|
|
|
Post by fe2cruz on Nov 7, 2007 23:49:11 GMT -5
I sent an email to all the vendors but this seems to be the made for SR500 specific shocks available currently: "PROGRESSIVE" MAGNUM:, Black spring, 12 Series, Pair 1424 $238 IKON shocks, 76 series, preload adjustment only. (Formerly KONI) Pair 1427 $338 Redwing replicas 60/90 springs $99: www.omarsdtr.com/dtshox.htmlfork springs seem a bit easier to come by. No fork brace to be found though. on the measurements current soft riding rear shocks according to 1999 spec 4.1 inch travel: 12% static sag 30% loaded sag I think I'll try to change these numbers to 25 and 35 when I get the new shocks and see if it feels better. My neighbor has an XSEleven solo. We complared our wheels, brakes and hardware to the SR and there seemed to be a lot of similarities. Good luck on your rig. Seems like it would be a fun powerful bike to use. -c
|
|
|
Post by milkman on Nov 8, 2007 1:41:13 GMT -5
Ebay US has a Tarozzi fork brace for the SR500, $99 USD
Search for this item no.: 170167071000
|
|
|
Post by fe2cruz on Nov 8, 2007 3:09:22 GMT -5
Ebay US has a Tarozzi fork brace thanks milkman Mine's a 78 USA. Is there a difference? They should be the same KYB 35C as the rest of the SRs and XS650s right? The ext tube has a circumference of 6.19in or 157mm. checked more on racetech and they seem to only have emulators for the SR500/XS650 FEGV S3001 $169.99
|
|
|
Post by milkman on Nov 8, 2007 3:46:56 GMT -5
fork brace should fit no worries
|
|
lurch
Full Member
Posts: 217
|
Post by lurch on Nov 8, 2007 14:31:42 GMT -5
Ebay US has a Tarozzi fork brace for the SR500, $99 USD Search for this item no.: 170167071000 I just bought on of these braces he has 4 left the guy ships the same day VERY IMPRESSED LURCH
|
|
|
Post by fe2cruz on Nov 8, 2007 14:37:21 GMT -5
I just bought on of these braces he has 4 left the guy ships the same day VERY IMPRESSED LURCH DO you have photos of the install? How's it feel in the turns and on braking? Maybe only my SR500 will get presents this christmas.
|
|
lurch
Full Member
Posts: 217
|
Post by lurch on Nov 10, 2007 4:40:50 GMT -5
I just bought on of these braces he has 4 left the guy ships the same day VERY IMPRESSED LURCH DO you have photos of the install? How's it feel in the turns and on braking? Maybe only my SR500 will get presents this christmas. Part wont arrive till late next week from the US fitted a similar brace (Micron) to my XJ650 & it made a world of difference I'll post a pic when it arrives LURCH
|
|